1. Williams’s Voicemail
Regarding criticism, the brand new plaintiffs argue that Williams, an enthusiastic SCBE personnel and you may principal regarding Bon Lin, retaliated resistant to the plaintiffs because of the leaving a great disparaging voicemail when they had submitted an ailment towards OCR. In response, SCBE contends the voicemail message can’t be experienced retaliatory just like the Williams wasn’t aware the plaintiffs had recorded the OCR criticism until . The latest legal agrees with SCBE on this allege.
*796 To establish that the voicemail are retaliatory, this new plaintiffs need demonstrate that SCBE understood and you will acted given that plaintiffs engaged in secure interest. Thaddeus X v. Blatter, 175 F.three-dimensional 378 , 387 (sixth Cir.1999). In the event that Williams try unaware that the OCR problem is filed at the time she kept new voicemail content, it could be impossible on her behalf to possess retaliated because of safe passion.
To display you to Williams realized of the OCR ailment at big date she leftover the latest voicemail, the fresh new plaintiffs provide a contact off Hargrave to help you SCBE administrators and you will SCHD nurses, in which Williams is actually CC’d, that mentioned J.C. “commonly file a grievance that have OCR in the event that .