Autor: Plasterm

3. Performance

Dining table step one illustrates the fresh prevalence of each of one’s dangers of the research, according to the level of severity found. Likewise, it reveals the new comparisons amongst the withdrawals regarding children toward different dangers. Overall, the participants whom displayed nothing wrong ranged anywhere between % who had no troubles with tricky Internet have fun with or more to 83.4% who had no problems having on the internet brushing. I keep in mind that all of the average and big difficulties varied between cuatro% to have sexting and you may 17% to own difficult Internet sites fool around with. 9% out-of moderate/severe troubles plus in cyberbullying, they achieved 13.7%. The brand new frequencies based in the various other amounts of issues was in fact always greater for women compared to guys.

Desk 1

Prevalence of each and every of risks just like the a function of the fresh new seriousness of one’s problem toward complete try as well as gender.

In this regard, significant differences were also found between boys and girls in the mean total scores of cyberbullying victimization (Welch’s t = ?2.02, p < 0.043, d = 0.07), online grooming (Welch's t = ?3.51, p < 0.001, d = 0.12) and problematic Internet use (Welch's t = ?2.07, p < 0.039, d = 0.07). In these cases, the mean scores were higher for girls than for boys. There were no significant differences in the rest of the risks: cyber dating abuse victimization (Welch's t = ?1.9, p < 0.058, d = 0.12) and sexting (Welch's t = 0.94, p < 0.410, d = 0.03).

Regarding the type of school (private and public), significant differences were only found in the risks of online grooming (t = ?3.37, p < 0.001, d = 0.13) and sexting (t = 3.8, p < 0.001, d = 0.15). The mean scores were higher in public schools than in private schools in both cases.

In terms of the educational stage (1st–2nd grade of CSE, 3rd–4th grade of CSE and Post-secondary Education), statistically significant differences were found for the risks of cyberbullying victimization (p < 0.002), online grooming (p < 0.001), sexting (p < 0.001) and problematic Internet use (p < 0.001). The scores were higher in 3rd–4th grades, except for online grooming victimization, where higher scores were found in Post-secondary Education (see Table 2 ).

Table 2

Variations since a function of informative stage (1st–second, 3rd–last grades out of CSE and you may Blog post-supplementary Degree) on the threats (n = 3212, with the exception of happening out-of cyber relationships abuse having n = 1061).

Note: Yards = arithmetic imply; SD = practical deviation, F = Welch’s-F, p = significance; ? 2 = eta squared.

Desk step 3 reveals the latest correlations between the some dangers.